FIELD ARCHITECTURE

T084-EN010

REVISION

06

STATUS

C

0623/09/19XB

Approved

VLEVLE-HEK
0511/06/19XB

Approved

VLEVLE-HEK
0422/03/19XB

Reissued For Approval

VLEVLE-HEK
0312/02/08ABG

Approved

AALBCABCA-
0219/11/07CGO

Issued For Approval

ABGAALBCA-
0112/10/07CGO

Issued For Comments

ABGAALBCA-
0013/09/07CGO

Internal Check

ABGAAL--
Rev.DateIssued byRevision memoChecked byApproved by
Engineer approvalTotal approval

This document is the property of TOTAL. It must not be stored, reproduced or disclosed to others without written authorisation from the Company.

Contents

1. Introduction
1.1. Scope
1.2. Codes, Standards, Specifications and Reference Documents
1.3. References
1.4. Acknowledgements
1.5. Definitions & Abbreviations
2. Field Development strategy
2.1. General
2.2. Early Production System
2.3. "Design One and Build Multiple"
2.4. Field Architecture Decision Tree
3. Floater and Development concept Selection
3.1. General
3.2. Dry versus Wet Trees
3.3. Disconnectable Riser System
3.4. Export System
3.5. Fluid Transfer Lines
3.6. TLP Based Development
3.7. Spar Based Development
3.8. FPSO Based Development
3.9. Semi-Submersible Based Development
3.10. SSP based Development
3.11. Subsea Tie-back
4. Well Architecture
4.1. General
4.2. Satellite Wells
4.3. Cluster System description
4.4. Template System Description
4.5. Cluster vs Template Configuration
5. Flowline System Architecture
5.1. General
5.2. Production Loop
5.3. Single Production Flowline
5.4. Injection Lines
6. Subsea Processing and Active Lifting
6.1. Gas Lift
6.2. Subsea Processing

List of Figures

2.1. The Mero Field Development Phase Development Strategy
2.2. Field Architecture Decision Tree
3.1. TLP based development featuring a deep reservoir and wet trees
3.2. Matterhorn Project (W&T Energy) – Production Riser configuration featuring Dry Trees
3.3. Surface Trees on the Matterhorn TLP - Production Deck Level (refer to Figure 3.2, “Matterhorn Project (W&T Energy) – Production Riser configuration featuring Dry Trees”)
3.4. Riser Tensioners on the Matterhorn TLP - Cellar Deck Level (refer to Figure 3.2, “Matterhorn Project (W&T Energy) – Production Riser configuration featuring Dry Trees”)
3.5. FPSO based development featuring a shallow reservoir and subsea trees
3.6. Typhoons and Hurricanes around the World
3.7. FPSO with Disconnectable Riser System (Bluewater)
3.8. Cascade / Chinook Field Development (Phase I)
3.9. HySRTM (Hybrid 'S' riser) System combined with Disconnectable Turret
3.10. Total's Girassol offloading system overview and buoy detail
3.11. Main Export System options
3.12. Fluid Transfer Lines in catenary configuration (Kizomba 3D- view)
3.13. Gravity Actuated Pipe concept (SBM patent)
3.14. The Ursa TLP
3.15. The Matterhorn Development Scheme (W&T Energy, GOM)
3.16. Matterhorn TLP
3.17. Kizomba A TLP close-moored to an FPSO
3.18. Kizomba A Field Development Scheme (ExxonMobil, WOA)
3.19. Kizomba B Field Development Scheme (ExxonMobil, WOA)
3.20. Moho Nord TLP close-moored to a PU
3.21. Red Hawk Field Development
3.22. Red Hawk Cell Spar with hull formed by seven hollow tubes
3.23. Kikeh field's truss spar and FPSO
3.24. Egina Field Development
3.25. Kaombo Field Development
3.26. CLOV Field Development
3.27. The Na Kika Field Development
3.28. The Na Kika Floater during installation phase (artistic view)
3.29. Petrobras SSP Piranema
3.30. The Ormen Lange long tie-back project
3.31. The West of Shetland gas project
4.1. Roncador Field Development (Module 1)
4.2. Dalia clustered wells with manifold system
4.3. Girassol clustered well and manifold (incl. foundation) system
4.4. HOSTTM template modular system (FMC)
4.5. MSS template modular manifold system – Vetco Gray (now BHGE) (Conceptual)
4.6. Ormen Lange 8-slot template (42x26mx12m - 1150t)
4.7. Otter template (TOTAL)
5.1. Total's Pazflor development featuring 'daisy chain' for the Oligocene reservoirs
5.2. Dalia 'Daisy Chain' configuration – typical mid-manifold arrangement detail
5.3. Girassol and Rosa 'Daisy Chain' configuration – end-manifold arrangement detail
5.4. Field development featuring offline arrangement (artistic view)
5.5. BP's Greater Plutonio development
5.6. Total's Pazflor development featuring single flowlines and subsea separation for the Miocene reservoir development
5.7. Hydrates forming plugs (left) or free circulating in ‘Coldflow’ condition (right)
5.8. The Coldflow process
5.9. Injection system typical architecture
6.1. Typical IPB structure featuring gas lift tubes
6.2. Tordis Subsea Process Structure installation from the Saipem 7000
6.3. Typical Subsea Gas Compression System Diagram (FMC Kongsberg)
6.4. Asgard Subsea Gas Compression System
6.5. Framo Electric Driven Subsea Multiphase Pump
6.6. Preliminary 3D view of the chemical injection station (DORIS)

List of Tables

3.1. Development Concept Alternative Summary
   Next