![]() | Subsea Connections and Tie-in Methods | T084-EN007 | ||
REVISION 05 | STATUS C | ![]() |
![]() |
05 | 19/03/19 | JSO | Approved | CGA | VLE | - | HEK |
04 | 01/03/19 | JSO | Re-Issued for Approval | CGA | VLE | - | HEK |
03 | 12/02/08 | GCO | Approved | ABG | AAL | BCA | - |
02 | 19/04/07 | GCO | Issued For Approval | ABG | AAL | BCA | - |
01 | 23/10/06 | GCO | Issued For Comments | ABG | AAL | BCA | - |
00 | 14/09/06 | GCO | Internal Check | ABG | AAL | - | - |
Rev. | Date | Issued by | Revision memo | Checked by | Approved by | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Engineer approval | Total approval |
Contents
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Interface requirement
- 3. Connector Technology and Manufacturers Review
- 4. Tie-in Tool Technology Review
- 5. Tie-in Methods
- 5.1. General
- 5.2. Rigid Spools and Well Jumpers
- 5.3. Flexible Spools, Jumpers, Spur Lines
- 5.4. Thermoplastic Composite Pipe (TCP) Spools andJumpers
- 5.5. Flying Leads
- 5.6. Lay-down & Pull-in
- 5.7. Direct Pull-in
- 5.8. Deflect-to-Connect
- 5.9. Vertical Stab, Hinge-Over & Lay-away
- 5.10. Surface Tie-in, Lay-away or Lay-to
- 5.11. Hybrid Steel Pipe & Flextail
- 6. Advantages & Disadvantages
- 7. Hot-Tap Tie-in
- 8. Subsea Metrology
- A. Manufacturers and Contractors List
List of Figures
- 2.1. Tie-In Method main interfaces
- 2.2. Example of vertical tree (Aker Solutions – KAOMBO PVXT)
- 2.3. Universal Tie-In System (UTIS) termination heads (courtesy of TechnipFMC)
- 2.4. TOTAL’s KAOMBO Manifold
- 2.5. UCON-H tie-tools secured into purpose-built deployment basket (TechnipFMC)
- 2.6. DMAC / ROV based Pull-in and Connection Tool (courtesy of Subsea 7)
- 2.7. TechnipFMC – UCON-H connection system with associated tie-in tools
- 3.1. Stabcon KC4-10 ID8 connector with insulation cap (TechnipFMC)
- 3.2. UCON-H insulated (insulation in white) Termination Head docked onto inboard cradle (TechnipFMC)
- 3.3. UCON-H tie-in – cross section (TechnipFMC)
- 3.4. UCON-H KC4 Collet Connector rotational tolerances (TechnipFMC)
- 3.5. Pressure ratings for KC4.2 connector sizes (TechnipFMC)
- 3.6. Collet Connector (courtesy of Oil States)
- 3.7. Details of collets, multibore, alignment pins (courtesy of TechnipFMC)
- 3.8. Collet connector (CL5000) typical load capacity (courtesy of Oil States)
- 3.9. Schlumberger (former Cameron) 18 ¾” DWHC and HC collet connector
- 3.10. Multibore Clamp Connector (clamp and seal plate), by courtesy of Aker Solutions
- 3.11. Clamp Connector (nowadays design) (Aker Solutions)
- 3.12. Single bolt clamp connector arrangement (courtesy of Destec)
- 3.13. Two-Piece McPAC clamp (by courtesy of Schlumberger)
- 3.14. Freudenberg clamp
- 3.15. Clamp connector (CL5000) typical load capacity (courtesy of BHGE)
- 3.16. HCS tie-in system – main components (Aker Solutions)
- 3.17. HCS tie-in system – Moho HCS-R 12” inboard (left) & outboard (right) (Aker Solutions)
- 3.18. HCS tie-in system – clamp opened (left) and closed (right) (Aker Solutions)
- 3.19. HCS tie-in system – Metal To Metal (MtM) TX seal (Aker Solutions)
- 3.20. Mandrel connectors (by courtesy of TechnipFMC and Dril-Quip)
- 3.21. H-4 Mandrel connector locked (left picture) – release (right picture) (GE)
- 3.22. Mandrel connector (Dril-Quip DXe connector)
- 3.23. Merlin connector (Oil States)
- 3.24. Standard flange design (API, ANSI)
- 3.25. Compact flange and seal ring (courtesy of Vector International)
- 3.26. Compact flange design & tie-in principle (courtesy of Vector International)
- 3.27. Compact flange vs conventional (ANSI) flange (6" CL2500 welded neck)
- 3.28. API 6A Welding neck flange Type 6B (left) and 6BX (right)
- 3.29. API 6A Welding neck flange Type 6B (left) and 6BX (right) shown after make up
- 3.30. Differences between API SPEC 6A and API SPEC 17D flanges
- 3.31. API SPEC 6A ring joint gasket types
- 3.32. API Type BX ring joint gasket
- 3.33. SBX ring joint gasket
- 3.34. SRX ring joint gasket
- 3.35. API SPEC 17D ring joint gasket types
- 3.36. Girassol 13" 5/8 API 5000 Welding-Neck (WN) flange BX 160
- 3.37. Girassol 13" 5/8 API 5000 Swivel flange BX 160
- 3.38. Girassol octagonal gasket SBX 160
- 4.1. Pull-in and lockdown tool (left) and Universal connection tool (right)
- 4.2. Pull-In & Connection Tool (PICT), by courtesy of Aker Solutions.
- 4.3. Universal Tie-In System (UTIS), by courtesy of TechnipFMC
- 4.4. Exxon Zinc pull-In & connection system (by courtesy of HydroTech)
- 4.5. ROV-mounted tool Flexconnect II (by courtesy of Technip)
- 4.6. Flexconnect III porch structure (including guide pin) and SIM engagement
- 4.7. Stroke-In Module (SIM) articulation
- 4.8. ROV-mounted tool Rovcon, by courtesy of TechnipFMC
- 4.9. ROV mounted with DMaC interface skid and pull-in & connection module, by courtesy of Subsea 7
- 4.10. ROV-operated Tie-in System (RTS), by courtesy of Aker Solutions
- 4.11. ROV-mounted tool DFCS, by courtesy of Sonsub
- 4.12. ROV mounted tool Icarus (by courtesy of BHGE)
- 4.13. ROV mounted tool connection sequence
- 4.14. Connection as performed by a ROV mounted tool
- 4.15. TechnipFMC old and new tie-in systems
- 4.16. UCON-H tie-in system and associated tools (TechnipFMC)
- 4.17. HCS tie-in system – installation sequence (Aker Solutions)
- 4.18. HCS tie-in system – ROV tooling (Aker Solutions)
- 4.19. VCS tie-in system and ROV tooling (Aker Solutions)
- 4.20. VCS tie-in system – alignment sequence (Aker Solutions)
- 4.21. VCCS tie-in system (non-insulated version shown) (BHGE)
- 4.22. MATIS on its skidding system and during launched operation, by courtesy of Acergy (now Subsea 7)
- 4.23. DeepMATIS Tool main characteristics (Subsea 7)
- 4.24. DeepMATIS Tool RIS and MLF (Subsea 7)
- 4.25. Girassol SLED flange catcher (Subsea 7)
- 4.26. Girassol SLED flange catcher (Subsea 7)
- 4.27. BRUTUS System (SAIPEM)
- 4.28. BRUTUS reaction tool and axial force tool (SAIPEM)
- 5.1. MATIS on its skidding system and during launched operation
- 5.2. Horizontal rigid (steel) jumper arrangement
- 5.3. Horizontal Jumper between x-mas tree and manifold (e.g. Girassol, Rosa Lirio, Moho Bilondo)
- 5.4. Two possible configurations for production well jumpers (top view)
- 5.5. U-shaped well jumper installation based on supply boat and drilling rig crane (Girassol)
- 5.6. Z-shaped well jumper installation using construction vessel heavy lifted crane (Girassol)
- 5.7. U and Z shaped injection well jumpers comparison
- 5.8. Various vertical connection spool/ jumpers, by courtesy of Schlumberger/ Nexen Petroleum (left - Aspen field, GoM) and FMC (right)
- 5.9. Vertical ‘M’ shape Spool featuring Horizontal Connector (typical)
- 5.10. Typical drill centre layout with horizontal spools and jumpers
- 5.11. Typical drill centre layout with vertical 'M' jumpers and spools.
- 5.12. Vertical jumper installation (Stab & hinge over method)
- 5.13. TOTAL Girassol field, rigid steel jumper installation (spreader bar, horizontal connectors)
- 5.14. Flexible jumper principle
- 5.15. Flexible jumper fitted with vertical connectors (Aspen field, GoM), by courtesy of Nexen Petroleum
- 5.16. composite jumper deployed on a subsea pallet (Airborne Oil&Gas)
- 5.17. composite jumper deployed with two cranes (MAGMA Global)
- 5.18. Pull-in principle
- 5.19. Direct pull-in
- 5.20. Deflect to connect principle
- 5.21. Vertical Stab and Hinge Over principle
- 5.22. Lay-away principle, (by courtesy of Petrobras)
- 5.23. Hybrid steel pipe and flextail principle
- 7.1. Hot-tapping machine and protective structure (lower part) installed on the Frigg Gas Export Line
- 7.2. Installation of welding habitat
- 7.3. Hyperbaric hot-tap welding & assembling process
- 7.4. Hot tap outline operation
- 7.5. The HydroTech diverless hot-tap clamp (Oil States)
- 7.6. Gooseneck Spool and Retrofit Hot-tap Tee (IKM Ocean Design)
- 7.7. Hot Tap Cutting Unit HCTU used for ORMEN LANGE hot taps (Clear Subsea Well)
- 7.8. Deepwater Hot Tap Cutting Unit HCTU used for Asgard hot taps
- 7.9. Subsea 1200RC tapping machine (TDW)
- 8.1. A typical transponder array
- 8.2. The pre-measurement tool
- 8.3. 3D laser spool metrology completed by 2G Robotics for Subsea 7
List of Tables