![]() | PIPELINE SYSTEMS | T084-EN002 | ||
REVISION 04 | STATUS C | ![]() |
![]() |
04 | 05/09/19 | CRA | Approved | CGA | VLE | - | HEK |
03 | 27/02/19 | CRA | Re-issued for approval | CGA | VLE | - | HEK |
02 | 12/02/08 | GDE | Approved | GCO | AAL | BCA | - |
01 | 05/01/07 | GDE | Issued for Comments | GCO | AAL | BCA | - |
00 | 22/12/06 | GDE | Internal Check | GCO | AAL | - | - |
Rev. | Date | Issued by | Revision memo | Checked by | Approved by | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Engineer approval | Total approval |
Contents
List of Figures
- 2.1. Wall thickness components and definitions
- 2.2. Schematic of pipeline end expansion
- 2.3. Force Profile Envelope for a Fully Mobilised Pipeline
- 2.4. Typical_Thermal_Transients
- 2.5. Example Force Profiles – First Heat-up
- 2.6. Example Force Profiles – Second Heat-up
- 2.7. Temperature Profile at Time t
- 2.8. Force Profile at Time t
- 2.9. Incremental Displacement between Time t and t-1
- 2.10. Force Profile – Position of Virtual Anchors – 2nd Load
- 2.11. Incremental Displacements to full mobilisation
- 2.12. Mid-line displacement for 5 load cycles (typical)
- 2.13. Pipeline upheaval buckle
- 2.14. Prop buckle instability
- 2.15. Typical Lateral Buckle from Side-scan Sonar Imag
- 2.16. Lateral Buckling Assessment by FEA
- 2.17. Typical Snake Lay Configuration (exaggerated vertical scale)
- 2.18. Buckling Response from Snake Lay
- 2.19. ILA Main Characteristics
- 2.20. Illustration of the steel corrosion process
- 2.21. Galvanic cell formed by zinc sacrificial anode
- 2.22. Flow chart over design checks for a free span
- 3.1. In-Line Assembly (Total Dalia Project)
- 3.2. Pipeline end manifold (PLEM) during installation (Deep Blue vessel, Dalia Project)
- 3.3. Flexible pipe end fitting mounting
- 3.4. End fitting locking
- 3.5. Flexible intermediate connection at working platform
- 3.6. Deepwater Subsea Manifold
- 3.7. Subsea Well
- 3.8. Steep S-Lay Solitaire vessel (installation of pipeline in 2775 m -2007)
- 3.9. J Lay semi-submersible: S7000 (24”OD Blustream Black Sea in 2150m of water depth)
- 3.10. Reel-Lay vessel Seven Oceal (Campos Basin (2009) : laying in 1940 m WD)
- 3.11. Pipeline installation vessel: Technip Deep Blue (2500m WD pipe lay capacity)
- 4.1. Billet piercing process
- 4.2. Continuous lamination
- 4.3. Electric Resistance/Induction Welded pipe
- 4.4. Submerged Arc Welded pipe fabrication process
- 4.5. Spirally-oriented seam welded pipe
- 4.6. Typical flexible pipe structure for oil production and transportation
- 4.7. Flexible pipe water depth capability (Technip data - 2006)
- 4.8. Different types of stainless steel fabrication process
- 4.9. Hot rolling clad pipe manufacturing process
- 4.10. Thermo-hydraulic Fit Method For Tightly Fitted Lined Pipe
- 4.11. Grooved Liner System
- 4.12. Figure 4.9: Composition of wet insulated rigid line
- 4.13. Figure 4.9: Typical pipe in pipe system
- 4.14. Figure 4.10.2: Bulkhead assembled between 8-in oil line and 14-in sleeve
- 4.15. Figure 4.10.2: Pipeline in bundle configuration
- 5.1. 5Layer Pipeline Insulation coating
- 5.2. Pipe in Pipe 3D View (Typical)
- 5.3. Cryogenic Pipe in Pipe 3D View
- 5.4. LNG Pipe in Pipe Bulkhead Design (SEAL Engineering design)
- 5.5. Prototype as tested with Invar inner pipe (Technip)
- 5.6. A sample of thermally insulated flexible
- 6.1. Heating cables in onshore plant & heating panels for tanks heating
- 6.2. Configuration Wet-DEH system
- 6.3. Principle of DEH system
- 6.4. DEH PIP Concept
- 6.5. Mid-Line assembly (MLEC) of Shell DEH PIP
- 6.6. DEH PIP – Heating Spread on one segment – Plug remediation
- 6.7. Three-phase star configuration.
- 6.8. EHT PP TECHNIP Concept
- 6.9. Integrated Production Bundle (TECHNIP)
- 6.10. Figure 6.2.4.5: Integrated Production Bundle (Kvaerner)
- 7.1. Figure 7.2.1: Single pass plough (long beam configuration)
- 7.2. Figure 7.2.2: Multi-pass plough
- 7.3. Feeding vessel
- 7.4. Trailing suction hopper dredger
- 7.5. Deep sea dredger (R & D)
- 7.6. Flexible fall pipe vessel in rock dumping operation
- 7.7. Pre- lay pipeline support
- 8.1. S-lay configuration
- 8.2. J-lay configuration
- 8.3. Figure 8.3.2: J-Lay System. Variable angle ramp for shallow and deep water
- 8.4. Reel-lay configuration
- 8.5. Schematic of the pipelay catenary
- 8.6. Controlled depth tow method
- 8.7. Vertical flexible lay configuration
- 9.1. Field Signature Method principle
- 9.2. FSM applied to subsea pipeline
- 9.3. FSM applied to subsea production template
- 9.4. Online FSM system based on field bus
- 9.5. FSM system in subsea remote monitoring
List of Tables
- 2.1. Examples of Hoop stress and utilisation factors defined by ASD codes
- 2.2. Examples of equivalent stress utilisation factors defined by ASD codes
- 2.3. Cumulative plastic strain criteria
- 2.4. Coefficients for Lateral Buckling (after Hobbs, 1984)
- 2.5. Typical tubular dropped objects
- 2.6. Typical bulky dropped objects
- 4.1. Linepipe grades (C-Mn steel)
- 5.1. Comparison of Insulation Materials
- 5.2. Thermal insulation material for pipe in pipe system
- 6.1. Advantages and drawbacks – DEH Wet insulated pipelines
- 6.2. DEH-PIP technology – Track record
- 6.3. Advantages and drawbacks of the DEH technology for wet insulated pipes
- 6.4. Advantages and drawbacks of the heat tracing technology
- 8.1. Examples of S-lay parameters
- 8.2. J-lay tension parameters for different pipe sizes in 1000 m WD
- 8.3. 1600T basket storage carousel load cases
- 10.1. Material selection
- 10.2. Installation methods and limitation versus sealine technology
- 11.1. Advantages & Disadvantages Summary