6 Advantages & Disadvantages

The following table is a list of the main advantages and drawbacks of each tie-in methods:

Tie-in Method

Advantages

Drawbacks

Rigid Steel Spools/Jumpers

(Section 5.2)

  • Simple and robust design

  • Flowline expansion (T°, P) absorbed by spool piece

  • Match flowline insulation requirement

  • Replacement of the jumper is possible without any impact on subsea equipment

  • Longer overall tie-in operation when considering subsea metrology operation

  • Accurate measurements of connector relative positions

  • Large deck area required (spool/jumper transportation)

  • Weather sensitive operation

  • Two subsea connectors are required per spool/jumper

Flexible Spools/Jumpers

Spur Lines

(Section 5.3)

  • High degree of flexibility for layout

  • Less demanding subsea metrology accuracy

  • Low load transmitted to structures (some rigid spools at riser base spools have been replaced by flexible spools on Girassol to overcome the issue of high loads)

  • Replacement of the jumper is possible without any impact on subsea equipment

  • More expensive solution than steel jumper

  • Lower thermal insulation performance versus spool wet insulation or pipe-in-pipe

  • Two subsea connectors are required per jumper

Thermoplastic Composite Pipe (TCP) Spools/Jumpers

(Section 5.4)

  • High degree of flexibility for layout

  • Different methods of installation available depending on length and size

  • Lightweight & high fatigue resistance

  • Composite pipe is corrosion free

  • Reduced CAPEX and OPEX compared to rigid or flexible solution

  • Better insulation performance

  • Limited ID diameter

  • Limited internal pressure

  • Limited water depth

  • Two subsea end-fitting and outboard connectors required per jumper

Flying leads

(Section 5.5)

  • High degree of flexibility for layout

  • Many flying leads can be deployed at the same time on deployment basket or frame

  • In some cases, electrical or optical flying leads can be pre-installed onto jumper or subsea structures

  • Some reliability issues encountered with high power connectors

  • Many crossing between flying leads laid on the seabed impending recovery of flying leads

  • Two ROVs required most of the time

Lay-down and Pull-in

(Section 5.6)

(Flexible lines and umbilicals)

  • Laying and connection operations are independent

  • First end and second end applications

  • High pull-in loads may be necessary

  • Optimum seabed conditions

  • Limitations in flexible line diameter

  • Complexity and size of tools

Direct Pull-in

(Section 5.7)

(Rigid and flexible lines and umbilicals)

  • Allows initiation without additional anchor

  • High pull-in loads acting on subsea structure

  • First end initiation only

  • Coordination of two vessels

Deflect-to-Connect

(Section 5.8)

(Rigid pipelines)

  • Laying and connection operations are independent

  • First end and second end applications

  • Large area of unobstructed seabed is required

  • Longer tie-in operation

Vertical Stab, Hinge Over and Lay-away

(Section 5.9)

(Rigid and flexible lines and umbilicals)

  • Low installation loads transmitted to structure

  • Initiation of the line and preparation of the connection are simultaneously performed

  • Weather sensitive operation

  • Heave compensation would be required for the rigid flowline

  • First end initiation only

Surface Tie-in, Lay-to or Lay-away

(Section 5.10)

(Flexible lines and umbilicals)

  • Reliability of connections performed in surface

  • Connection tested prior to the installation

  • First end and second end applications

  • Only connections to subsea trees are possible: incompatible with subsea arrangement involving manifold which implies more than one connection

  • Simultaneous presence of both laying vessel and drilling rig

  • No possibility to unmake the connection subsea for maintenance purpose (seal change-out or other)

Hybrid Steel Pipe & Flextail

(Section 5.11)

  • High degree of flexibility

  • Low load transmitted to structure

  • Only one subsea connector is required, e.g. standard flange connection between flowline and flextail.

  • Critical initiation or abandonment phases as the ‘flextail’ will not necessarily match the steel flowline A&R requirement

  • Water depth application is limited by the flexible technology

The above summary table clearly establishes that there is no obvious or simple tie-in method that could be considered as the generic solution for deepwater applications.

There is good range of alternative tie-in methods and only a thorough evaluation of all relevant field technical data, as further itemised in Section Chapter 2, Interface requirement “Interface Requirement”, can provide the most cost effective tie-in method and technology to be selected for each project.

loading table of contents...