5 Contracting strategy
Depending on the worldwide economical situations, different contracting strategies (for the provision of the selected floaters) can be envisaged, as follows:
The merits (& disadvantages) of above contracting strategies are outside the scope of this document.
5.1 EPCI Contractors
The following table summarizes the main contractors of production floating facilities with references in FEED/EPCm (management of EPC contracts), EPC and EPC+I (Installation) contracts:
Table 5.1 - Main EPCI & EPC Contractors
Company | FEED/EPCm | E P C | EPC+I | Website |
HHI Hyunday Heavy Industry / DSME | × | × | ||
SHI Samsung Heavy Industry | × | × | ||
KBR | × | |||
SAIPEM | × | × | × | |
FLUOR | × | |||
TECHNIP FMC | × | × | × | |
KVAERNER | × | |||
AKER Solutions | × | × | ||
COOEC (CNOOC) | × | × | ||
MCDERMOTT | × | × | × | |
SEMBCORP MARINE | × | |||
KEPPEL OM | × | |||
EXMAR | × | |||
SUBSEA 7 | × | × | ||
AIBEL | × | × | ||
WOOD | × | × | ||
HEEREMA | × | × |
Lease and Operate Contractors (FPSO)
Table 5.2 - Main EPCI & EPC Contractors
Company | L&O | EPC | Website |
BLUEWATER | X | ||
BW Offshore | X | X | |
YINSON | X | ||
EXMAR | X | X | |
MODEC | X | X | |
SBM | X | X | |
TEEKAY | X | ||
Bumi Armada | X | ||
MISC | X |
5.2 Main Shipyards
There are two distinct sub-systems (for fabrication) which form an offshore FPU, namely: (1) the topside and (2) the hull. These two distinct sub-systems with the mooring system drive the schedule (planning) of offshore field development (see Section Section 5.3, “Typical Development Schedules”).
Areas with large ship building industries (hulls and topsides) are in South East Asia: mainly in South Korea (3 shipyards) and Singapore (1 shipyard) with new shipyards capabilities being developed in China and Malaysia. South Korea used to be the world's largest shipbuilding nation in terms of tonnage and numbers of vessels built (all market included). Since 2017, China is the largest shipbuilding country (based on completions in gross tonnage), followed by south Korea and Japan.
The following Table presents the main shipyards and topside fabricators gathered by area:
Table 5.3 - Main Shipyards & Topside Fabricators
Company | Location | HULL | Topside | Type | Website | |
China | ||||||
CSIC - DSIC (Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Corporation) | Dalian, | × | × | SEMI FPSO/ FPSO | ||
CSSC | SWS (Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co…) Guangzhou | Yangtse river, shanghai | × | × | FPSO | |
COSCO | Qidong, Zhoushan | × | × | FPSO | ||
COOEC | Qingdao | × | × | FPSO/FLNG/ Semi /SPAR | ||
CFHI | Zhuhai | x | FPSO | |||
PJOEC | Penglai | × | × | TLP/FPSO/Semi | ||
BOMESC | Tianjin | × | FPSO/FLNG/ Fixed Platform | |||
QMW (McDermott) | Qingdao, | × | FPSO/FLNG | |||
CPOE | Qingdao | × | FPS | |||
CMHI (China Merchant Heavy Industry) | Nanshan Guangdong | × | × | FPSO | ||
CIMC Raffles | Yantai, | × | × | FPSO | ||
WISON | Nantong Yard | Jiangsu | × | FLNG/Semi/ FPSO/ FSRU / FLNG | ||
Zhoushan Yard | Shanghai | × | × | |||
South East Asia | ||||||
SHI (Samsung Heavy Industries) | Geoje Korea | × | × | FPSO/TLP/ Semi/FLNG | ||
HHI (Hyundai Heavy Industries) /DSME | Ulsan Korea | × | × | TLP/Semi/ FPSO/FPU | ||
Aibel | Laemchabang Thailand | × | FPSO/ Platforms | |||
Keppel Offshore & Marine | Tuas Pioneer | Singapore | × | FPSO/FSO/TLP FLNG/FSRU | ||
MMHE(Malaysia Marine & Heavy Engineering) West | Pasir Gudang, Malaysia | × | FPSO/FSO | |||
MCDERMOTT | Batam, Indonesia | × | × | FPS | ||
SAIPEM | Karimun, Indonesia | × | FPSO | |||
PTSC | Vietnam | × | FPSO/semi/ | |||
SembCorp Marine | Tuas Admiralty Karimun Pt (SMOE) Batam | Singapore Singapore Karimun Batam | × | × | FPSO/FSO/ Semi | |
EUROPE | ||||||
Kvaerner | Stord, Verdal, Norway | × | × | FPSOs/Semi/TLP | ||
Heerema | Hartlepool UK Vlissingen Netherlands | × | FPSO | |||
Dragados | Cádiz yard Algeciras , Spain | × | × | FPS/Semi-Sub/Buoys | ||
Rosetti Marino | Piomboni Yard, Italy | × | FPS | |||
Aibel | Haugesund, Norway | × | FPSO | |||
Saipem | Airbatax, Italy | × | FPSO | |||
GOM/US | ||||||
Gulf Island Fab | Louisiana, US | x | × | FPS | ||
MCDERMOTT | Morgan City, Louisiana, US | × | FPS | |||
Kiewit | USA | × | Semi / FPSO | |||
Ingleside ( Subsea 7) | Texas, USA | × | FPSO | |||
Dragados | Altamira, Tampico Mexico | × | FPSO | |||
Brasil | ||||||
BrasFELS (Keppel O&M) | Angra dos reis Rio de Janeiro, | × | × | FPU/FPSO/ Semi-sub | ||
Estaleiro Jurong (Sembcorp Marine) | Aracruz,Brazil | × | × | |||
Odebrecht | Rio de Janeiro, | × | ||||
Middle East | ||||||
McDermott | Djebel Ali, Dubai | × | × | |||
Larsen & Toubro | Zubair, Oman | x | ||||
Dubai Drydocks World | Dubai, UAE | × | ||||
AFRICA | ||||||
Paenal DSME | Angola | × | ||||
SHI-MCI fze ( Ladol) | Nigeria | × |
The following Figure 5.1, “Samsung Heavy Industries – Geoje Shipyard (South Korea)” and Figure 5.2, “Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. (South Korea)” show the size and a general view of two major shipyards in South Korea.
5.3 Typical Development Schedules
The following Tables present typical development schedules for the main FPUs, and for preliminary evaluation at conceptual phase and study. Such schedules will depend greatly on the worldwide economic status and demands for steel, energy, transportation and resources availability.
![]() | Note FPSO main characteristics provided here after: FPSO newbuilt or conversion at Contractor standards
|
Theses schedules will depend greatly of the EPC contract strategy.
In case of a Basic Engineering followed by a Call for tender and an EPC contract awarded to a yard contractor (South Korea, China), more time is needed for detail engineering and procurement before to start topside fabrication and overall schedule is significantly extended
The following Table presents typical FPSO execution schedule with yard contractor
![]() | Note FPSO main characteristics are provided here after: Newbuilt FPSO by EPC Yard Contractor
|
![]() | Note TLP main characteristics provided here below:
|
![]() | Note Semi main characteristics (typical):
|
![]() | Note Spar main characteristics (typical):
|
5.4 Transportation & installation
5.4.1 General
The global nature of the offshore oil & gas industry calls for heavy maritime transportation & lifting means for moving large equipments such as hulls or topside modules.
The following Sections present an overview of the Transportation Vessels and Heavy Lift Vessels commonly used for the platforms and floaters transportation and installation.
Refer to ( – Offshore Reference Book) for further technical descriptions of the Transportation Vessels and Heavy Lift Vessels.
5.4.2 Transportation Vessels
Such transportation means from one continent to the other (e.g. TLP hull fabricated in Asia with final fitting of process topsides in the Gulf of Mexico) require large deck load, fast loading, transit and offloading capabilities.
A number of transportation vessels are available and can be categorised in two main groups:
Semi-submersible vessels
Ship shaped vessels plus craneage capabilities
The semi-submersible vessel disposes of sophisticated ballast system to float-on & float-off typical floating hulls, such as semi-submersible rigs, TLP, FPU and SPAR hulls, see following Figures.
For other smaller equipments (e.g. topside manifolds, mooring reels, subsea foundations) it is preferable (economic) to use the ship+craneage capabilities (Figure 5.11, “Jumbo ‘J1800 class’”), especially in remote area where quay facilities are un-sufficient with crane capacities in the 500T-1000T range.
The main Transportation Contractors are:
BIGLIFT Shipping BV (www.bigliftshipping.com)
BOSKALIS (www.boskalis.com)
JUMBO (Kahn Scheepvaart BV) (www.jumboshipping.nl)
COSCO Shipping (www.coscoht.com)
Offshore Heavy Transport (www.oht.no)
5.4.3 Heavy Lift Vessels
For offshore deck integration (SPAR) the offshore heavy lift vessels will be required. The main Heavy Lift Contractors are:
HEEREMA (www.heerema.com)
SAIPEM (www.saipem.it)
McDERMOTT (www.jraymcdermott.com)
The following Figures present some Heavy Lift Vessels: