14 ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES

The advantages and disadvantages of several different configurations relevant to flexible and steel risers including hybrid risers are summarized in the following Table 14.1, “– Advantages & Disadvantages of different riser configurations”:

Configuration

Advantages

Disadvantages

Steel Catenary riser and Steel Lazy Wave Riser

  • Simple configuration

  • Very simple installation

  • Simple pipeline connection at seabed

  • Reduced Number of Components

  • Reduced Number of Cold spots

  • Progressive slope limits the slugging problems at riser bottom.

  • No discontinuity with Flowline

  • Fabrication of the SCR is normally performed as an extension of the pipelay operations

  • If installation by reel-lay vessel accepted, fabrication of the SCR may be performed onshore allowing better conditions for welding activities.

  • Installation of SCR is performed as an extension of pipelaying

  • Installation can be performed by reel-lay vessel, thus reducing installation duration

  • No subsea tie-ins to perform

  • Coiled tubing can be deployed from FPSO for hydrate remediation purpose

  • Change of slopes/elevations is minimized to improve the flowing conditions.

  • Individual production loss in case of one flexible riser major failure, limited to one branch

  • Liable to rapid wear at seabed touch down point

  • Unsuitable for shallow water (rigid pipe)

  • High static load at top end connection

  • Wear at seabed can be exacerbated by fluctuations in oil density or slugging causing repeated lift-off and set-down

  • Resistance to dynamics associated with vessel heave

  • Cyclic fatigue at TDP and Top of riser due to vessel motion combined with current and hydrodynamic loads

  • Soil Data Modelisation

  • Requirement for Skid if Gas Lift is required.

  • Potential riser Anchoring (Pipe Walking) at riser bottom

  • Low Local Content

  • High quality weld required

  • Tight tolerances

  • High quality inspection program (AUT)

  • Complex hook-up operations

  • Large impact of fabrication constraints on installation

  • Fatigue damage during installation to be considered , notably if reeled

  • Unlikely pre-laying of SCRs prior to FPSO arrival

  • Heavy pipelay ship required

  • Complex installation of the GL skid if required

  • In case gas lift , efficiency of the artificial lifting should be carefully assessed

  • Pigging operations through the flex joint may be limited to low sea-states.

  • large amount of insulation may be required on the separate gas lift riser.

  • All cold points should be avoided within the injection manifold.

  • The injection module shall accommodate the Flowline expansions.

  • Most critical fatigue zone (TDP) is very difficult to instrument

  • Assessment methods of fatigue damage from the measurements data (extrapolation methods, numerical models calibration)

  • Critical elements of the SCR gas lift injection (if required) module are not recoverable

Free Hanging Flexible riser

  • Simple configuration

  • Very simple installation

  • Simple pipeline connection at seabed

  • Compact

  • Little response to dynamic motions (little fatigue)

  • Active Heating system can be integrated

  • No discontinuity with Flowline

  • All manufacturing and product testing activities take place onshore offering good conditions for assembly and quality control of the work.

  • Gas lift and Fiber Optic insertion during fabrication of the riser.

  • The installation of the flexible risers open to a wide range of vessels.

  • Can be wet stored on seabed

  • Change of slopes/elevations is minimized to improve the flowing conditions.

  • During production, the gas lift tubes integrated in the IPB riser may provide heat to the production core pipe.

  • An active heating system (heating cables) can be integrated in the riser structure.

  • Individual production loss in case of one SCR major failure, limited to one branch

  • Liable to rapid wear at seabed touch down point

  • High static load at top end connection

  • Wear and risk of birdcaging at seabed can be exacerbated by fluctuations in oil density or slugging causing repeated lift-off and set-down

  • Resistance to dynamics associated with vessel heave

  • Cyclic fatigue due to vessel motion combined with current and hydrodynamic loads

  • Requires long Qualification tests (thermal tests, acive heating, monitoring…)

  • riser Touchdown curvature (Compression > Birdcaging)

  • Clashing

  • Material temperature Limitation

  • Special care should be taken not to damage the outer sheath during installation.

  • In case gas lift , efficiency of the artificial lifting should be carefully assessed .

  • Limited U-value for conventional insulated flexible risers (f 3.0 to 3.5 W/m2K).

  • Potential Plugging of one or several GL tubes (hydrate, sand).

  • Insulation of the gas lift injection fitting is required to avoid cold point.

  • In case gas lift , efficiency of the artificial lifting should be carefully assessed .

  • Limited U-value for conventional insulated flexible risers (f 3.0 to 3.5 W/m2K).

  • Plugging of one or several GL tubes (hydrate, sand).

  • Insulation of the gas lift injection fitting is required to avoid cold point.

  • Fragility of the Fiber optic components under rough conditions

  • Compatibility of intelligent pigging with flexibles

Lazy S Flexible riser

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • Simple pipeline connection

  • Mid-water support is relatively stable

  • Good possibilities for multiple line applications

  • High mid-water velocities may be counteracted by a large mid-water buoy with high tension and lateral stiffness

  • Lower seabed wear than a free-hanging catenary

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • Potential wear at seabed if buoy tension is insufficient

  • Need to control bending at end terminations and at mid-water buoy

  • Mid water buoy must be configured so that it does not move adversely in high mid-water velocities

  • Wear at seabed can be exacerbated by fluctuations in oil density or slugging causing repeated lift-off and set-down.

  • Complex Design of mid-water buoy for deepwater application considering external prerssure.

Steep S

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • Wear at seabed eliminated

  • Good possibilities for multi-line applications

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • More complex connection at seabed

  • Possible yaw instability of mid-water buoy

  • Seabed unit must resist upward forces

  • Complex Design of mid-water buoy for deepwater application considering external prerssure.

Lazy Wave

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • Less complex seabed connection

  • Mid-water support stable

  • Simple installation and pipeline connection

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • Potential for rapid wear at seabed touchdown (greater than for lazy S but may be less than for free hanging catenary

  • Wear at seabed can be exacerbated by fluctuations in oil density or slugging causing repeated lift-off and set-down.

  • Susceptible to large motions in cross currents

  • Not well suited to slug flow in Riser

  • Not well suited for closely spaced, multi-line applications due to possible interference

  • Potential clashing /hook-up of adjacent lines

Steep wave

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • Wear at seabed eliminated

  • Mid-water support stable

  • Possibility for multi-line application when used with spacer frames

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • More complex connection at seabed

  • Susceptible to high transverse current velocities

  • Seabed unit must resist upward forces

  • Potential clashing /hook-up of adjacent lines

Configuration

Advantages

Disadvantages

Pliant wave

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • Movement restricted and hence potential for wear at seabed reduced

  • Seabed approach may be specifically designed to resist wear

  • Mid-water support stable

  • Restraint against movements due to current

Same as flexible riser plus:

  • Seabed unit must resist forces from Riser

  • Restraint attachment to riser adds complexity

Riser tower

  • Combines advantages of rigid and flexible risers to improve performance under vessel motion and environmental loading

  • Lower rigid section relatively stable and requiring minimum maintenance

  • Compliance assists connection to a floating unit with a wide motion envelop (FPSO or semi-submersible)

  • Upper flexible lines individually retrievable

  • Upper flexible section isolates lower section from extreme dynamic effects at sea surface

  • Well adapted for riser system where flow assurance is critical

  • Well adapted for congested area

  • Reduced deck space and payload on floating unit

  • Top riser including sub-buoy is accessible by divers for installation and maintenance

  • Schedule flexibility by permitting the installation of maximum components prior the FPSO arrival

  • Flexibility of the design to cope with varying fluid duties such as production, water injection, gas and service fluids.

  • Flexibility of field layout by permitting the routing Flowlines independent of the approach angle of the riser hang-off, thus reducing Flowline lengths and minimising routing constraints.

  • Low In-Place Fatigue Damage

  • Small loads on Hang-off balcony

  • Good knowledge of interface with seabed

  • The HRT can be fabricated onshore. The onshore environment offers good conditions for welding, coating, NDE, assembly and quality control of the work.

  • Flexibility in FPSO delivery schedule

  • Low cost installation spread

  • Possibility to share production fluid duties

  • Gas Lift injection in vertical section

  • Depressurisation can be used as an alternative hydrate prevention strategy or as a back-up to dead oil circulation

  • Thermal sensors/optical fiber can be easily integrated and distributed within the HRT structure. Optical fiber can be included near production bore.

  • Easily integrated control and monitoring devices.

  • Overall complexity and cost may limit applications to deepwater systems. High cost of the connection between the riser tower and the air can.

  • Potential of flow induced vibrations particularly for multi-line applications

  • May require more facilities for installation and work-over of upper and lower units

  • Extensive qualification program

  • Complex Top and Bottom Assembly

  • Reliability of Design dependant on Weight and Buoyancy tolerances

  • Complex design of riser Bottom and tie-in spool to suit Flowlines pattern

  • Requirement for large spool (crossing spool shall be avoided for maintenance

  • Cost of Buoyancy/Components

  • Numbers of qualified foam vendors

  • Extensive testing program to validate installation aids and procedures

  • Damage to one tower during installation may impact several systems (production, water injection, gas lift, etc.)

  • Fatigue damage during towing

  • Installation of heavy foundations required

  • Large number of subsea connections

  • Many Components to inspect/maintain and potentially repair

  • Diver/ROV access to individual flexible jumper connections at top assembly

  • Compatibility of intelligent pigging with flexible jumpers/goosenecks.

  • Core Pipe is not inspectable

  • High cost

Hybrid Single Riser

  • Low riser hang-off loads, thus improving topside payload and reducing the specification level of riser pull-in equipment.

  • SCR sag-bend burying / fatigue issue eliminated due motion decoupling..

  • Local fabrication and content

  • Compact layout

  • All Flowlines/risers and umbilicals installation and pre-commissioning prior to the FPU arrival at site.

  • Reduces the time to ‘first oil’ and eliminates the need to mobilise additional equipment onto the FPU for Flowline flooding, gauging, pressure tests, de-watering, etc.

  • Provides a smooth flow path (reducing potential slugging) with minimum intermediate connections reducing potential leak points.

  • Is an ‘open’ riser system where each riser element can be inspected (e.g. visual survey, NDT) and a built-in monitoring device allows permanent logging of the buoy motions and tether tensions.

  • Flowlines/risers and umbilicals can be recovered to surface for repair or replacement with minimum disturbance of the field operations.

  • riser replacement and field decommissioning facilitated by way of reversible procedures.

  • Low In-Place Fatigue Damage

  • Good knowledge of interface with seabed

  • No buoyancy foam required.

  • Gas lift facility is integrated in the PiP annulus of the SHR, Less number of risers.

  • Flexibility in FPSO delivery schedule

  • Gas Lift injection in vertical section

  • Depressurisation can be used as an alternative hydrate prevention strategy or as a back-up to dead oil circulation

  • Easily integrated monitoring devices

  • In case of one SHR major failure, loss of production limited to one branch

  • Complex System

  • When there is a failure of one main tether the sub surface buoy will pitch. SCR hang-off have to be designed to manage this pitch.

  • In case of one main tether failure, the replacing tethers will have a different stiffness due to its different loading history.

  • Large number of SHRs => congestion of the area located within FPSO anchor pattern=> Limited possibility of future extensions

    • Low local content

    • Flexible Jumpers for HP/HV

    • Extensive Engineering

    • Long installation duration ( excluding all subsea tie-ins)

    • Installation of foundations required

    • Heavy pipelay ship required

    • Large number of subsea connections

  • Many Components to inspect/maintain and potentially repair

  • Compatibility of intelligent pigging with flexible jumpers/goosenecks.

Table 14.1 - – Advantages & Disadvantages of different riser configurations

Configuration

Advantages

Disadvantages

A - Top tensioned riser tower

(semi-submersible)

  • Long lengths are achieved by assembling shorter, identical lengths

  • If one element is damaged or suffers wear, it can be changed out

  • Ease of intervention access for traditional drilling and well work-over equipment

  • No requirement for installation vessel during all field life

  • Top tensioning system limits number of risers particularly on semi-submersible

  • Complex and heavy subsea manifolding in case of multiple wells and import/export lines regrouped on the same riser

  • Difficult option in case disconnection is required in severe weather

  • Integral bundle riser has to be retrieved as a complete unit for servicing any riser in it

B - Top tensioned Riser

(TLP)

  • riser system constrained to move approximately on the same arc as the floating unit particularly for SPAR and TLP

  • Long lengths are achieved by assembling shorter, identical lengths

  • If one element is damaged or suffers wear, it can be changed out

  • Ease of access for traditional drilling and well work-over equipment

  • No requirement for installation vessel during all field life

  • Ease of maintenance in case tree located on platform

  • Any riser can be retrieved or installed without affecting the operation of the other risers

  • Top tensioning system is simpler due to small stroke requirement

  • Multiple risers are practical

  • Cannot be disconnected in severe weather

C - Top tensioned Riser

(SPAR)

  • riser system constrained to move approximately on the same arc as the floating unit

  • Long lengths are achieved by assembling shorter, identical lengths

  • If one element is damaged or suffers wear, it can be changed out

  • Ease of access for traditional drilling and well work-over equipment

  • No requirement for installation vessel during all field life

  • Ease of maintenance in case tree located on platform

  • Any riser can be retrieved or installed without affecting the operation of the other risers

  • Top tensioning system replaced by buoyancy cans (passive)

  • Cannot be disconnected in severe weather


The advantages and disadvantages of riser tie-off at deck level and pontoon are also presented in Table 14.2, “– Advantages & Disadvantages of top riser tie-off point”:

Table 14.2 - – Advantages & Disadvantages of top riser tie-off point

Configuration

Advantages

Disadvantages

Deck level tie-off

  • Longer catenary therefore greater compliance

  • Access for installation, inspection and maintenance are simpler

  • No requirement for underwater connection

  • Potential for easier FPS conversion

  • Full wave forces and motions must be resisted through the splash zone

  • Difficulty in releasing coupling in severe weather when the floater is displaced from its central location

  • FPS stability and payload reduced

Pontoon tie-off

  • Reduced wave loading on Riser

  • Better FPS stability

  • May require diving for riser installation and spool connection

  • Access for inspection and maintenance activities is: not simple, limited to calm sea conditions and may require diving

  • Damage to attachment points may go unnoticed


loading table of contents...